PDF] Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification

This study evaluated the sensitivity of maximum likelihood (ML)-, generalized least squares (GLS)-, and asymptotic distribution-free (ADF)-based fit indices to model misspecification, under conditions that varied sample size and distribution. The effect of violating assumptions of asymptotic robustness theory also was examined. Standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR) was the most sensitive index to models with misspecified factor covariance(s), and Tucker-Lewis Index (1973; TLI), Bollen's fit index (1989; BL89), relative noncentrality index (RNI), comparative fit index (CFI), and the MLand GLS-based gamma hat, McDonald's centrality index (1989; Me), and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) were the most sensitive indices to models with misspecified factor loadings. With ML and GLS methods, we recommend the use of SRMR, supplemented by TLI, BL89, RNI, CFI, gamma hat, Me, or RMSEA (TLI, Me, and RMSEA are less preferable at small sample sizes). With the ADF method, we recommend the use of SRMR, supplemented by TLI, BL89, RNI, or CFI. Finally, most of the ML-based fit indices outperformed those obtained from GLS and ADF and are preferable for evaluating model fit.

A tailored-fit model evaluation strategy for better decisions

Transcultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the

References - 2012 - Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics

The factor structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models

Assessing the overall fit of composite models estimated by partial

Full article: Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Model Misspecification

Factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

PDF) Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Misspecification in Growth

The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in